Why Space has Three Dimensions

Why Space has Three Dimensions   – see Matthew Chalmers, New Sci 28 Sept 2013

That space is 3-D follows from electromagnetic and gravitational theory, both being experimentally validated and both free of quantum theory’s offence to views of reality (Chalmers, NS 28 Sept, p.34).

The reasons are surely much deeper than the inverse square ‘law’ (argument in the Box).

First, accelerated charges emit synchrotron radiation in a beam relative to the inertial reference frame of special relativity, of 3-space plus time.

Second, Einstein’s general relativity gives slightly different answers for light travel times (eg. Earth to Venus) for different accelerated frames – a unique answer comes by specializing to the inertial frame.

Einstein’s strong form of the “equivalence principle” led him astray, in that it took accelerated frames as equally valid, rejecting a unique space frame. His followers like Fock, Weinberg and Logunov have found good reasons for the inertial frame and thus for 3-space being real.

Seeing 3-space as real and higher dimension spaces as mathematical models, thus implies a weak form of the equivalence principle, applying locally, eg. in Einstein’s lift, but not in rotating planetary systems.

This entry was posted in gravitation and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to Why Space has Three Dimensions

  1. Pingback: Hawking no comparison with Einstein | Crisis-in-Physics

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s