Zeilinger’s anthropocentric Quantum Mechanics

Extraordinary New Scientist endorsement of anthropocentrism

Regarding mankind and our activities as central to the universe
(anthropocentrism) has long been regarded as anti-scientific.  Yet
Anil
Ananthaswamy
 endorses the latest utterance of Anton Zeilinger:

There is no sense in assuming that what we don’t measure about a system has an independent reality.  (New Scientist 25 June, p.13)

Schrödinger’s darned Cat will be laughing her socks off, when she escapes from the box while the experimenter sleeps, then scratches his eyes out.  It was her master who introduced the ‘entanglement’ hypothesis, which Zeilinger used to supposedly establish that the unobserved Cat has no “independent reality”.

Extraordinary claims require an extraordinary level of proof.  Zeilinger’s
statistical analysis depends on
‘fair  sampling’, assuming that his photo-detectors show no enhancement of any class of signals. This was a key limitation of the Aspect experiment and other optical Bell test experiments – let’s expect it to likewise cause Zeilinger’s downfall.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in quantum crisis and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s